Up to date

What cleaning labour costs, by US state

Hourly pay for cleaners, housekeepers and laundry workers in all 50 states and DC, measured against each state’s own average wage.

Hassam RafkeyAPXXO Data — labour
Data as at
2025
Last checked
2026-09-15
Measured in
US dollars per hour
Rows
51

Key findings

64.2%
In Nevada, cleaning pay is this share of the state average

$19.16 against a state-wide mean of $29.83.

36.6%
In District of Columbia it is this

$19.54 against $53.37 — a similar wage in a very different labour market.

1.59×
Between the best and worst paying states

$22.79 in Washington against $14.32 in Mississippi.

At a glance

Top 12 of 51

The twelve best-paying states for cleaners, against what everyone in that state earns. The wider the green bar runs past the black one, the further cleaning sits from the middle of that labour market.

$0.00$10.29$20.58$30.87$41.16Washington$22.79$40.06Massachusetts$21.75$41.16New York$21.55$39.65California$21.25$38.79Connecticut$20.48$37.22Vermont$20.35$33.20Oregon$20.29$34.84Colorado$20.11$37.11Alaska$20.05$35.92Minnesota$19.86$34.21Maine$19.83$31.63New Hampshire$19.76$34.31

How they spread out

Each bar counts how many of the 51 states fall in that band. Cleaning pay clusters tightly; the all-occupation average does not, which is why the ratio between them varies so much more than the wage itself.

CLEANERSlow $14.32high $22.791.59× from end to endALL OCCUPATIONSlow $24.43high $53.372.18× from end to end

What the figures show

The pay table and the ratio table are not the same ranking (link to this section)

Cleaners are paid most in Washington at $22.79 an hour and least in Mississippi at $14.32 — a spread of 1.59 times. That is the obvious reading, and it mostly tells you where wages in general are high.

The derived column asks a different question: what does cleaning pay come to as a share of what everyone in that state earns? On that measure Nevada leads at 64.2% and District of Columbia comes last at 36.6%, with a median of 57.3%.

A cleaner in District of Columbia earns about the same as one in Nevada. Relative to the people around them, they earn 28 percentage points less.

What the share is actually measuring (link to this section)

Nevada sits at the top because its economy is built on hospitality: cleaning is close to the middle of that labour market rather than at its edge. District of Columbia sits at the bottom because it is full of highly paid professional and government work, which pulls the average away from everyone else.

So the ratio is not a measure of generosity. It is a measure of how far cleaning sits from the middle of the local labour market — which is what determines how hard the work is to staff, and against whom an employer is competing for the same person.

The distribution explains the rest (link to this section)

Cleaning wages cluster tightly across the country. The all-occupation average does not: it ranges far more widely, because it carries the whole local economy in it.

That is why the share varies more than the wage. Almost all of the movement in the ratio comes from the denominator — the state around the cleaner — rather than from the cleaner’s own pay.

What this is useful for, and what it is not (link to this section)

These are gross wages paid to employees. They are not the cost of employing someone, which adds payroll taxes, insurance, equipment, supervision and turnover, and they are not a contract rate.

OEWS is an establishment survey published once a year for the previous May, so it lags the market. In a year where wages moved quickly, this will be behind them.

The ratio is not about generosity. It is about how far cleaning sits from the middle of the local labour market, and therefore how hard it is to staff.

How we worked this out

All figures are the hourly mean wage from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, 2025, for all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

The occupations are the official BLS categories: 37-2011 Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners; 37-2012 Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners; 51-6011 Laundry and Dry-Cleaning Workers.

"Share of state average" is the derived column: the cleaners' hourly mean divided by the hourly mean for All Occupations in the same state. It shows where cleaning labour is expensive relative to the local labour market, rather than simply where all wages are high.

That share runs from 36.6% in District of Columbia to 64.2% in Nevada, with a median of 57.3%.

These are gross wages paid to employees. They are not the cost of employing someone, which adds payroll taxes, insurance, equipment and supervision, and they are not a contract rate.

OEWS is an establishment survey published once a year, so it lags the market and does not capture very recent movements.

The numbers

51 rows · as at 2025

51 rows

What cleaning labour costs, by US state
RegionUS dollars per hourShare of state average wage (%)Housekeepers ($/hour)Laundry workers ($/hour)All occupations ($/hour)
Washington$22.7956.9$20.61$19.83$40.06
Massachusetts$21.7552.8$20.38$18.34$41.16
New York$21.5554.4$23.88$18.16$39.65
California$21.2554.8$22.08$19.11$38.79
Connecticut$20.4855.0$18.22$17.98$37.22
Vermont$20.3561.3$18.63$18.54$33.20
Oregon$20.2958.2$19.00$18.97$34.84
Colorado$20.1154.2$18.99$21.52$37.11
Alaska$20.0555.8$19.03$17.62$35.92
Minnesota$19.8658.1$18.45$18.55$34.21
Maine$19.8362.7$18.84$18.27$31.63
New Hampshire$19.7657.6$18.31$18.15$34.31
Illinois$19.5957.3$18.73$17.13$34.20
New Jersey$19.5752.2$19.10$17.53$37.52
District of Columbia$19.5436.6$21.83$20.04$53.37
Hawaii$19.4457.5$25.18$18.77$33.78
Rhode Island$19.4256.2$18.88$18.09$34.57
North Dakota$19.3462.8$17.14$18.24$30.79
Nevada$19.1664.2$20.89$17.90$29.83
Maryland$18.8850.6$17.40$16.99$37.30
Montana$18.5963.5$17.66$17.66$29.27
Wisconsin$18.5360.0$17.13$16.89$30.90
Delaware$18.2154.2$16.49$16.76$33.60
Arizona$18.1755.9$17.67$17.49$32.51
Pennsylvania$18.1657.5$16.23$16.24$31.60
Ohio$18.0658.3$15.68$15.50$30.96
Wyoming$18.0460.9$16.26$15.16$29.60
Idaho$18.0161.2$16.94$16.51$29.41
Nebraska$17.9559.8$16.45$17.18$30.00
Missouri$17.9260.0$16.41$16.52$29.89
Michigan$17.8157.1$16.36$17.08$31.21
Indiana$17.6960.5$15.88$15.37$29.25
Iowa$17.6461.3$15.88$16.43$28.76
Virginia$17.5549.3$16.59$15.73$35.60
New Mexico$17.5258.5$15.46$15.37$29.96
South Dakota$17.4863.1$15.38$16.21$27.70
Florida$16.8654.2$16.78$15.98$31.09
Kansas$16.8057.6$15.41$14.94$29.15
Kentucky$16.7158.9$15.35$14.35$28.36
Tennessee$16.6657.0$15.24$15.70$29.23
Utah$16.6452.2$17.65$17.05$31.87
Georgia$16.5452.2$15.02$14.74$31.69
North Carolina$16.3953.0$16.07$15.58$30.91
Texas$16.2951.5$14.56$14.99$31.61
West Virginia$15.9658.8$13.97$14.56$27.15
South Carolina$15.7355.2$14.88$15.15$28.50
Oklahoma$15.5256.7$14.21$13.99$27.38
Alabama$15.5156.1$13.40$13.86$27.65
Arkansas$15.2157.6$13.86$13.88$26.39
Louisiana$14.5653.5$13.15$13.40$27.21
Mississippi$14.3258.6$12.43$13.25$24.43

What to take away

Nominal cleaning pay varies 1.59 times across the states and tells you mostly where wages in general are high. Measured against each state’s own average it varies far more — from 36.6% to 64.2% — and that ratio is the one that predicts how hard a site will be to staff.

Where it came from

When this page changes next

OEWS publishes once a year, in the spring, for the previous May. This page changes then and not before. The pipeline checks every week and usually finds nothing, which is the expected result.

Last checked

This page is free to use and free to quote. If you cite it, please link back so readers can check the figures and the method for themselves.

Cite this page

Free to quote, with or without permission. A link back means your readers can check the figures and the method for themselves. The chart can be embedded straight into your own page, and it carries the attribution with it.

Hassam Rafkey, "What cleaning labour costs, by US state", APXXO, 2026. https://apxxo.com/en-us/data/cleaning-labour-cost-by-state/

More data from APXXO

All data pages →

Paying more than this?

These are benchmarks, not quotations. If you operate buildings across several sites and want to know what your estate should actually cost to run, tell us what you have.